Maybe you've been seeing headlines about Google maybe having to sell Chrome. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is pushing some big changes that could actually reshape how we browse the internet.
So what’s happening? Why is the U.S. government going after Google’s browser in the first place? And what would it mean if Chrome wasn’t owned by Google anymore?
Let’s break it down.

Why is Google in trouble?
This is all part of a major antitrust case, basically, the U.S. government thinks Google has too much power over search and is breaking the law by keeping competitors out.
For years, Google has been paying companies like Apple, Samsung, and Mozilla to make Google the default search engine in their browsers. These deals are massive. Google reportedly pays Apple around $20 billion per year just to stay the default on Safari. The result? Google Search has about 90% market share globally.
That’s what the DOJ says is the problem. They claim these deals stop other search engines like Bing, DuckDuckGo, or smaller startups from having a fair shot.
And now the court is discussing what Google should be forced to do to fix it.
The big proposal: Sell Chrome
One of the most extreme remedies the DOJ has proposed is this:
Google should be forced to sell its Chrome browser.
Yes that Chrome. The world’s most popular browser. The one millions of people use daily. The gateway to Google’s search engine, Gmail, Google Docs, and the rest of the ecosystem.
This wouldn’t be the first time a tech giant had to back off browser dominance
Back in the early 2000s, Microsoft faced a similar situation. It was forced to let Windows users choose their own browser instead of defaulting to Internet Explorer. That move helped open up the market, making room for browsers like Firefox and Chrome to grow (U.S. v. Microsoft Corporation (2001)).
Now, with Chrome in the hot seat, history might be repeating itself and the result could be more browser innovation and better privacy options for users.
Chrome helps Google dominate search traffic
Because Chrome isn’t just a browser, it’s also one of the main ways people reach Google Search. If you break that connection, Google can’t just set itself as the default anymore. It would need to compete on more equal terms, just like other search engines.
Search Engine | Market Share (2025) |
90% | |
Bing | 3% |
DuckDuckGo | 1.5% |
Yahoo! | 1.2% |
Ecosia | 0.6% |
Along with selling Chrome, the DOJ also suggested:
Banning Google from making any new browser for at least five years
Ending all deals that pay companies to set Google as the default search engine
Possibly even forcing Google to sell Android if these first steps don’t change the market
These aren’t final decisions yet but they’re very much on the table.
What does this mean for you as a Chrome user?
It might sound dramatic, but if you're just browsing the web and using Chrome like normal, this won't break your internet overnight.
If Google is forced to sell Chrome, a few things might happen:
1. Chrome could get a new owner
And yes, OpenAI has said they might be interested in buying it. Nick Turley, Head of Product at OpenAI, mentioned that a Chrome + ChatGPT combo could be powerful, especially for integrating AI into everyday browsing.
That’s interesting, but for now, it's just talk. No sale is happening yet.
2. Search defaults might finally change
One reason Google has stayed on top is because it's the default on most browsers. If the DOJ’s proposed remedies go through, Google wouldn’t be allowed to pay for that default position anymore. That means:
Safari users might see more choices when they first open their browser.
Firefox or Samsung’s browser might push other engines like Bing or DuckDuckGo.
Google would have to earn users by being the best, not just the default.
3. More competition = more innovation
Right now, the search engine market is basically Google... and then everyone else. If that grip loosens, we might see better alternatives pop up. Maybe with more privacy, better AI integration, or new features no one’s thought of yet.
For example, the Arc browser is pushing boundaries with its unique design and user experience. To learn more about how Arc could shape the future of browsing, check out my article on Arc Browser: The Future of Web Browsing.
Why this matters beyond just browsing
Google’s business isn’t just about search. It makes most of its money from ads, and those ads are powered by people using Google Search.
If Chrome goes to someone else, and Google can’t guarantee people will keep using its search engine... that could seriously cut into Googles ad revenue. That’s part of why this case is such a big deal. It’s not just about browsers, it’s about breaking up how tech giants connect their products to stay on top.
It could also set a huge legal precedent. If Google is forced to spin off Chrome, what’s next?
Could Apple be forced to separate the App Store from iOS?
Could Meta be told to sell Instagram or WhatsApp?
We don’t know yet. But regulators are clearly more willing to challenge Big Tech now than they were ten years ago.
Is Google really being forced to sell Chrome? Here's what we know in april 2025
We’re not there yet. Here’s what we know:
In late 2024, a judge ruled that Google violated antitrust law.
Now in 2025, the court is going through the “remedy phase”, deciding how to fix it.
A decision on the remedies is expected by August 2025.
Google plans to appeal, so whatever happens could be tied up in court for a while.
So no, Chrome isn’t being sold today. But the fact that the DOJ is seriously considering it and that big names like OpenAI are circling as potential buyers shows that the conversation has shifted. What once seemed impossible is suddenly on the table.
Final thoughts
If Google is forced to sell Chrome, it’ll be one of the biggest shakeups in tech in years. It might lead to more browser choices, better search tools, and a fairer market, or it might just end up being a messy court battle with no real change.
Either way, it’s a reminder that even the biggest players in tech aren’t untouchable.
For users like you and me, it’s a good time to:
Explore other browsers like Brave, Arc, Firefox, or Vivaldi
Stay updated on how tools like ChatGPT might change the web
And maybe question whether “default” really means “best”

Your website’s homepage is trying to do too much
Your website’s homepage is trying to do too much
Web & UX Design

Why people don’t read your content (what they do instead)
Why people don’t read your content (what they do instead)
Web & UX Design

5 things I've learned from working with linkedin marketing
5 things I've learned from working with linkedin marketing
Marketing
Vill du veta
mer om mig?
Explore my work
Webbdesign

Norrklint
Norrklint är ett svenskt fintechbolag som hjälper små och medelstora företag att hitta finansieringslösningar. För deras varumärke arbetade jag med att ta fram en ren och modern visuell identitet som förmedlar förtroende, tydlighet och professionalism. Designen fokuserar på intuitiva gränssnitt och tydlig kommunikation, vilket gör komplex finansiell information enklare att förstå för användarna.
Tools used
Wix Studio & Recraft
Webbdesign

Karlsson bil
Karlsson Bil är en bilhandlare baserad i Varberg som köper, säljer och renoverar fordon, bland annat den exklusiva serien Lignon Scandinavia med handbyggda Land Rover Defenders.
I projektet arbetade jag med att ta fram en webbdesign som kombinerar den klassiska Defenderns arv med ett modernt och stilrent uttryck. Fokus låg på att skapa en smidig och intuitiv upplevelse där besökare enkelt kan utforska aktuella fordon, läsa om specialbyggda renoveringar och få en tydlig bild av processen kring köp och försäljning.
Tools used
Wix Studio & Custom code
Webbdesign & Branding

Carin Fredén
Carin Fredén är en Malmöbaserad fotograf med fokus på högkvalitativ företagsfotografi och visuell varumärkeskommunikation. Hennes webbplats presenterar hennes arbete och tjänster och hjälper företag att stärka sin visuella identitet genom bilder.
Tools used
Wix Studio, Figma & kod





